Monday, March 5, 2012

How was the CBSE Physics Exam 2012?

How was AISSCE Physics Question Paper 2012?

  • Was the Board question paper 2012 up to the standard?

  • Were there any questions out of syllabus?

  • Was any of the questions too tough?

  • Were there any unexpected questions?

  • How was the numerical problems?

  • Did you get sufficient time to answer the questions?


Please post your response soon. Your responses on AISSCE Physics Question Paper 2012 can affect the marking/ evaluation and eventually the marks. Comment honestly.

READ TIMES OF INDIA's report on AISSCE PHYSICS EXAM 2012 here


aisscephysics2012set2

DOWNLOAD SET 2 OF AISSCE PHYSICS QUESTION PAPER 2012 SET 2 HERE (OUTSIDE DELHI VERSION)

Teachers from different cities have already sent their representation on the problems and anomalies found in the question paper. If your teacher hadn't done so, Hurry!!!. Request your teachers to have a thorough analysis of the question papers (All sets) and send the difficulties and anomalies in proper format to CBSE. (There is a format available at schools to send anomalies and problems in CBSE question Paper).
CBSE will consider these representations received while finalizing the marking scheme.

Wish you Good Luck ! Dear students.

500 comments:

  1. My ward felt the paper lengthy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I felt there was a lack of numerical questions, especially from the optics unit, amongst others. The paper was completely unexpected, and I'm very disappointed. :( I didn't get time to think properly for more than a few questions, but I don't know if that's the paper's fault or my own.

    I hope chemistry will make me feel better.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Most of the paper was unexpected.
    I haven't seen such a paper since many last years.
    Before exam i was expecting at least 90 marks but now i am sure my marks r going to be in between 75-80, nothing more nothing less.

    ReplyDelete
  4. y this kolaveri diiiiiii !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. dissappointing paper...lenghthy...they cnt xpect us to be machines to write dwn the ans the moment we see it!!! the lens prob ws disgustng!!!:(:(
    overall: dissappointed...3 sleepless nights underwater!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. the toughest ever in lst decade!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. weirdest paper ever.....maybe its just me but i thought it was really hard....

    ReplyDelete
  8. The paper was only based on conceptuals.
    The paper was too lengthy for 3 hours.
    Really sad.
    the person who set the paper was out of his mind.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It was a balanced paper... 2 three mark questions were a bit complicated...all 1 mark ques. were easy...five mark ques. related to telescope required application...and rest of paper was easy.

    Can any one tell me exact answer of two mark Q."when an ideal cap is charged by dc no current ...... of disp current?" and one mark ques."Why elec field lines must be normal to evry point of charged scondctr?"

    ReplyDelete
  10. I was in the exam hall with more expectations and when I got the question paper I was disappointed to see lack of numerical questions. I spent a lot of time to study numericals. I am not happy at all after Physics exam. We pray to get good marks.

    ReplyDelete
  11. When I started reading paper backwards, I was feeling comfortable lol. As the three marks question began to enter, I got nervous. And when the two marks questions came, I went, wtf? What is the level dude? This ain't cbse. However single marks were okay. I cannot claim the paper as lengthy, as I had finished it 15 mins before, but the thing was, I didn't knew few questions and left them over to think later. And later wasn't present. So, now I may claim it was hell lengthy. Seriously if someone scores 85+ in this exam, one prepared really well, atleast better than me.

    I am hoping to see a news headlines tomorrow morning about the exam, so that the marking goes really smooth. Actually I'm wishing.

    ReplyDelete
  12. the paper was lenthy , not a good paper...
    please upload the solution of the paper

    ReplyDelete
  13. The paper was really lenthy..and had many unexpected questions.. did not go well..hope chemistry exam would be better.

    ReplyDelete
  14. it was a very lengthy paper some questions were of iit level difficulty level very high cbse shold be linient in checking

    ReplyDelete
  15. very tough paper of iit level cbse should be lliberal in checking

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yes, the paper was very unexpected but not lengthy. Before the exam, I managed to complete all 15 Practice Papers in the Together with Physics book as well as all the past papers, but I was still surprised by the paper.

    90% of the paper was conceptual with no "standard" derivations, eg: microscope, telescope, mag. field on axis of ring, dipoles, etc. Most of the questions asked had never appeared in any of the sample papers or past papers.

    In my opinion, some of the especially difficult questions include:

    1) Why must the electric field be perpendicular to surface of charged conductor

    2) Derive the expression for self inductance of long solenoid of cross-sectional area A, length l, having n turns per unit length

    3) The current in forward bias is known to be more (~mA) than the current in reverse bias (~uA). What is the reason , then, to operate the photodiode in reverse bias.

    4)When an ideal capacitor is charged by a DC battery, no current flows. However, when an AC source is used, the current flows continuously. Explain on basis of displacement current.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Paper was really really ____. You fill the blanks b*****s. I knoow rocked

    ReplyDelete
  18. paper was really tough...

    ReplyDelete
  19. paper was very hardddddddddd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. guys jus check marking scheme of outside paper... it was not according to marking scheme.....
    very annoying paper:-(

    ReplyDelete
  21. the paper was easy according to my teacher. but she herself didnt know few qns :P

    ReplyDelete
  22. It was not as tough as I thought it would be!! 2 marks questions were bit complex and tricky ! Rest was OK !! I expect some 80-85 marks !!! GOD KNOWS !!!

    ReplyDelete
  23. IS IT NECESSARY TO PASS BOTH THEORY AND PRACTICALS INDIVIDUALLY....PLZ RPLY BECAUSE M NOT SURE ABOUT PHYSICS THEORY

    ReplyDelete
  24. paper was too lengthy ans toughness was also there .i thinkcbse

    ReplyDelete
  25. Kindly send me +2 physics case 2012 question paper at :
    amninder.kumar@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  26. any question paper must check what are the essential things a person must learn from the topic. but many a time it happens in such a way that the paper setter wants to exhibit their expertise. this is the clear example

    ReplyDelete
  27. it wasn't a "VERY" lengthy paper. The thing is that in the pressure of boards, we may get stuck on a few questions, otherwise the questions were smart and the paper could be completed in about 3 hours.

    ReplyDelete
  28. what's up with CBSE ...do they solve it before gvng it to us..it was too long ...being the topper of my school in phy...feel disgusting after wrtng tis exam...

    ReplyDelete
  29. The xam was really tough for me and many questions which i studied and expected did not come and depends on the evalaution of paper and all in hands of god now!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Dont be kidding.... it was damn easy.....
    optics sum u hav 2 aplly concept....
    answer is L1 L2 40 CM seperation....
    L2 L3 can be seperated by any real value.... it was so easy.....
    electricity sum.... resistance 5 ohms.... potential drop 1v...... tats easy too....
    5 marks... all 6 questions were thrown to score......
    electric potential sum again easy..... 4E volts.... C is at higher potential.....em waves sum 4886 amstrong wavelength balmer series
    i marks.... MAGNANIN HAS MORE AREA...
    DIRECTION OF CURRENT FLOW PQ AND CD....
    For medium A speed is less.... since spped is directly propotional to sinr.........

    ReplyDelete
  31. paper was a bit lengthy...but overall an easy paper...

    ReplyDelete
  32. Yes. It is necessary to pass in Theory and Practical separately

    ReplyDelete
  33. The SET 2 of AISSCE 2012 Physics Question paper is attached with the post

    ReplyDelete
  34. paper was normal but ws lengthy which actually made it tough. some idiot might have set this paper. 3 hours were not enough to solve every question with full satisfaction

    ReplyDelete
  35. EXPECTING 99 OR 100..........

    ReplyDelete
  36. paper was unexpected. There was no questio like compound microscope astronomical telescope.it was really very annoying.i have commited many mistakes like 15*10=250 in kirchoff laws question whose correct answer was 35 ohm but i got 37.5 ohm.and like closest distance approach i used e instead of e2 .i studied 50 hours in last 3 days but at the end i was crying.

    ReplyDelete
  37. optics question:o bloody hell there were so many things to be asked and apparently more importany ,n d numerical,3 markers hate you:x
    well physics paper treat like this only lately.
    VINEET JOSHI u r chairman of cbse not iit.hope from chemistry.

    ReplyDelete
  38. paper was easy infact very easy....................but time allowed is not enough.......ya 2marks ques. are tricky.paper was for parrot learner.lack of numerical,derivation UNEXPECTED...but overall i make my mind n by bleessing of god will be able to score above 66 out of 70

    ReplyDelete
  39. SRENEVASAN @ bhai apna roll no. de dio hm dekhenge tera result... lol..

    ReplyDelete
  40. optics question:o bloody hell there were so many things to be asked apparently more important n the numerical along with it.3 markers hate you:x physics paper treat us like this only lately.VINEET JOSHI YOU ARE DIRECTOR OF CBSE NOT IIT.hope from chemistry.

    ReplyDelete
  41. When i read the paper first, i thought it was easy enough. But the real problem arose when i started attempting it. It was damn lengthy. Forgot 2 do a 3 marks question though knew how 2 do it. some questions were tricky like the lens one. Could have been able 2 do it if had got some more time left in the end .

    ReplyDelete
  42. wtf was the papr???even in last hour...earthquake!!!
    i srsly want that person or comittee who made that papr...guys & girls...i think we should complain it to hrd...hope kapil sibbal will do something abt it....wasie in my centre,i heard a rumor that papr got leaked....i was so happy....but finally... :(

    ReplyDelete
  43. kirchoffs law question set 3 q 26 resistance is 5 ohms for sure.....
    potential drop 1v

    ReplyDelete
  44. The AISSCE physics paper was not easy at all. It was tough. What made it even worse is the fact that the question paper was so lengthy. The effort of the people who set the question paper is noticeable, as there were a few brain-teasers. But the length of the question paper and the fact that there were certain three mark questions that required quite a lot of time, made the paper unimaginably bad.
    What the board has done is thwart away the hopes of many students (like me), who have spent sleepless nights, hitting books, all year long to achieve greatness by scoring high in the CBSE EXAMS.
    All I can now hope is the correction to be lineant.

    ReplyDelete
  45. go on buddy..... 4607197 dont forget... THE INDIAN PUBLIC SCHOOL ERODE.... Checkout my english marks too...... u will faint for sure....

    ReplyDelete
  46. i m physics lect for 20 yrs. for it was not difficult but students hv to try some questions which they hv not done in any question bank. so time was wasted n when they reach 5 mrks questions time was over. which make it difficult

    ReplyDelete
  47. paper was really bad.if you dont plan on giving the questions in exam,why do we hear out teachres saying again and again to do certain topics...
    it was lengthy and could never be attempted completely by a student whose sole aim was cbse
    a few of my frnds preparing for JEE actually agreed

    ReplyDelete
  48. @ hridayanshu..... tere roll no be de......

    ReplyDelete
  49. SET 1 was mine destiny.... IT WAS AWESOME 95+ EXPECTING.. HOPE IT HAPPENS SO.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Dont mind giving my BITSAT,IIT,AIEEE Roll no's too..... LOL!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  51. unexpected..topics i learn..i didnt seen in ppr..lenghty..:(i expect 60 but now i thought will i pass? ?? :(

    ReplyDelete
  52. the paper was not that tough . only the 2 marks section quite tricky .rest all okay....

    ReplyDelete
  53. it was not the toughest paper...but it required the application of concepts studied...some 2 and 3 markers seemed tough but it could be done if one knew the concepts well....overall it was moderate paper

    ReplyDelete
  54. toughest paper i've ever seen.....unexpcted questions...i ve loosed ol my self cnfidence....hope other subjects ll b quiet easy...;(
    cn any1 snd me answers to 1 and 2 marks questions(set 1)?????????

    ReplyDelete
  55. Bro my paper was 55/1 in that paper R was asked which u will get after getting equivalent resistance 5ohm yaar mai accept karta hu mai parrot learner hu but kuch galti jaise maine ki wo to bilkul bardasht exam dene se pehle soche the 90 ke upar payenge but now lag raha hai sirf 72-77 tak payenge. Why only me aaj raat ko 3 baje se uth ke baith ke padha tab ja ke sab complete hua phir bhi why

    ReplyDelete
  56. use less paper very hard

    ReplyDelete
  57. it was not the level of iit but i guess it was not from most expecting question it was difficult for the students who study at the eleventh hour but for the student who has studied hard for the whole year it was good paper

    ReplyDelete
  58. Who says that the exam was easy??? It was not accrding to the mark scheme, no derivation, no numericals.. Even not seen this ques in IIT.. So lenghty.. Worked so hard, even having problem in my body.. But was totally unexpected..

    ReplyDelete
  59. cn any1 snd me solution for 2marks questions set 1.???????? ;(

    ReplyDelete
  60. It was really lengthy... The ques were tricky and could be done but needed at least half an hour more...:(

    ReplyDelete
  61. cn any1 snd me solution for 2marks questions set 1.???????? ;(
    Reply

    ReplyDelete
  62. it was very a very difficult paper. i am really upset and worried about the result. i hv spent 3 sleepless nites bt dat is useless nw. nevr xpctd such difficult paper. our my teachr marked some important topics wich often cum in boardz nd i hv solved 7 sample papers bt nothing could help me... :( the paper was lengthy too :(

    ReplyDelete
  63. ws this paper leaked n der is going to b a rexam.??? Is this true or rumour..??????

    ReplyDelete
  64. Delhi 2012 Physics paper was very unexpected . It was tough. The question paper was so lengthy. Also it was not according to the weightage given in the marking scheme. This has put too much pressure on the children , making them fear the boards. Delhi physics paper was close to IIT level.
    On the other hand it was heard that the outside delhi paper was leaked beforehand . This is disgusting. CBSE has lost its credibility

    ReplyDelete
  65. it was really hard .... nd unexpected...???? lack of numericals nd fully based on derivation part ....

    ReplyDelete
  66. nonsense of the state of the country.............

    every time these type of news u will hear

    ReplyDelete
  67. I hope CBSE ensures correction is lenient as it affects our future...Even outside Delhi paper was almost IIT level!!!:(

    ReplyDelete
  68. Last years paper was so much easier!! Hope chemistry goes well!

    ReplyDelete
  69. I AM FAILED !!!!!!!!! :( shiittt!!!!! i really worked so hard but its useless ..shiiittttt

    ReplyDelete
  70. SRENEVASAN u r entelligent sure i guess,but don't be overambitious.it led fall like rahul dravid.....................ya ur answers are correct i wrote the same too.but lets wait for results to come.i m also jee aspirants n u don't requd to know my roll no.u can see on newspr.by seeing ur ans. im sure u will b there also.letswait........................................then speakkkkkkkkkk

    ReplyDelete
  71. it was very a very difficult paper. i am really upset and worried about the result. i hv spent 3 sleepless nites bt dat is useless nw. nevr xpctd such difficult paper. my teachr marked some important topics wich often cum in boardz nd i hv solved 7 sample papers bt nothing could help me... :( the paper was lengthy too :(

    ReplyDelete
  72. Why not discuss the answers..?

    ReplyDelete
  73. It was BLUNDERR! If you see last 5 year question papers,then hardly 2-3 questions came from them plus most of the questions were totally unexpected.Like in Foreign Set,Velocity Selector.Also,I expected derivations from Magnetic effects,either cyclotron,toroid or two parallel conductors and
    based on gauss's theorem from Electrostatics.
    From EM Waves also,they asked difficult questions.
    I expected uses of diff EM Waves.But,in all,it was quite tough.Maybe cz I did not study the whole year and completed course in feb only.But I really worked hard,yet it was bad.

    ReplyDelete
  74. The paper seemed like 'AIEEE theory'!!! <10% direct ques.

    ReplyDelete
  75. I got 55/1 . In many questions it was not clear what they expected from us. It can also be said that the time was to some extent insufficient.I hope they don't repeat this next year too and that they'll make the correction lenient this year. :)

    ReplyDelete
  76. bhai jitne bhi easy bata rahe ho apne roll no. likh do hum dekh lenge. itna hard paper. me 2-3 din se soya nahi tha. tution me har test me highest aate the.lakin aaj paper ne saari nind uda di. i hope it will not be repeated in chemistry

    ReplyDelete
  77. OK
    Post the questions to be discussed. The questions must be complete including diagrams. You can scan and upload to any image server like photobucket, flicker or picassa and give the link for images or even the complete question. The answers to the questions can be discussed here

    ReplyDelete
  78. Hard paper...disappointing...managed 5 mrks answer but 2mrks n 3 mrks sum questions were complex and much numericals...this time time not much derivations came...theorical questions were too three...praying god for good marks...
    hope to do well in chem...
    ps : pls dont give hard chem paper like in phy.

    ReplyDelete
  79. OMG! Delhi set is far better than Foreign.I'd get around 55.Foreign set it extremely bad.

    ReplyDelete
  80. tooooooooo much worst paper was... i had never expected................... was.... never expected...........

    ReplyDelete
  81. really the physics paper was very tough. so many expected questions and the time was not enough to complete. hope cbse board will be liberal in the valuation

    ReplyDelete
  82. really yar....

    ReplyDelete
  83. chor sab cbse wala phadu question tha all questions required a lot of thinking which made it tough

    ReplyDelete
  84. pitty.....no words to say......

    ReplyDelete
  85. Foreign Set 2!
    http://www.box.com/s/39q2zai1p20k44bbnkx4

    ReplyDelete
  86. The paper was seriously ...seriously very hard damn fucking hard !!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  87. Seriously it was too..hard there were not too many derivations i worked a lot on them ...


    and i am very irritated !! i didn't sleep for the last three days

    PHYSICS YOU ALWAYS SUCKED !!

    ReplyDelete
  88. I was actually happy after the exam but after reading these comments I am a little worried. Just a little thing though, most of the 'difficult' 2 markers were NCERT solved ex.

    ReplyDelete
  89. the paper was very tough and unpredictable, it was quite lengthy too :( .Spread this by commenting in other websites so board will take some action for liberal checking.

    ReplyDelete
  90. OMG!Delhi Set is far better than Foreign!
    Foreign Set 2!
    http://www.box.com/shared/39q2zai1p20k44bbnkx4/1/224965030/1730583052/1

    ReplyDelete
  91. It was tough....xpecting linient marking...only good ques were included in paper even in Delhi or All India...manganin is thicker bt data given was insufficient..xpecting 57 out of 70... :|...scored 63 in preboards which are deliberately made tougher...GOD SAVE US..90% DREAM IN DANGER!!!...in spite of such hard work.. :'-(

    ReplyDelete
  92. idiot the paper was out of 70 not 100!!

    ReplyDelete
  93. They are talking about percentage

    ReplyDelete
  94. It was such a tough paper as usual, especially 2 marks and 1 mark questions.

    ReplyDelete
  95. paper was really tough .... questions were tricky.... waiting 4 d news .about lenient checking.... and according to dis question paper , time was not enough...

    ReplyDelete
  96. Above comments make me feel a lil bit better.
    Happy that i'm not alone.
    And yea... Physics was disastrous to say the least :(

    ReplyDelete
  97. paper was lenghty.. a bit diificult i was expecting to get at least 60 but now ill be ended wid above 50! not a good paper!
    3 marks questions were difficult.. a coceptual and a paper which only a smart and intellgent students could solve.. it wznt made for average students.!

    ReplyDelete
  98. The paper was really lengthy and tough. I did'nt get any time to check the questions a second time. Finished the paper right when the bell rang. I could'nt understand what was the principle of oscillator. Question paper had many unexpected questions. I had referred many sample papers,but only very few questions were repeated. 3 marks were quite tough,but 5 marks were comparitively easy. When i spent more time on 3 marks, had only very little time to write 5 marks. I am very disappointed that there was no numericals from telescope, microscope etc. I had expected 95 above before the exam, but now i think I will hardly get above 80. All my friends shared the same opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Seriously,disappointed....expected good numericals.

    ReplyDelete
  100. electric field must be perpendicular to the surface of conductor because the surface is equipotential
    no tangential field component must be present for an quipotential surface
    so electric filed line must be perpendicular

    expression for self inducatance can be found out by equating LI = BA

    a photodiode is operated in reverse bias because
    consider a sc in which minority charges are n type
    when light is incident equal no of electron hole pair is created
    as n>>p relative change in p is more , so it is used in reverse bias

    ReplyDelete
  101. ya the paper was so lengthy..there are many unexpected questions which i have not ever seen in last year paper.. i am so scared about result!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  102. Very Very Very Sad,...worked hard but this is unexpected,,,.,.,.questns veryy tough....total pattern was different.....i dont know even i pass...plz tell if any questions r incorrect to expect a pass mark?

    ReplyDelete
  103. Srinivasa RaghavanMarch 6, 2012 at 3:18 AM

    The paper was very lengthy and tough,my son says many of his friends were literally in tears.There was not many problems.some of the two marks question needed two pages answers.Now these poor children will have to compete with state board students of tamilnadu.CBSE definitely should do something about this.

    ReplyDelete
  104. wtf...
    the papr suckzz,the 3 markers were a bit tricky..

    ReplyDelete
  105. the paper was easy the only thing i want to ask is in the lens question for 55/1 how do u find the distance btw 2nd and 3rd lens.

    not even aieee lvl forget iit

    ReplyDelete
  106. Here is the delhi set with solutions:

    http://www.wikifortio.com/823763/Delhi%20Set.zip

    Please upload all india set and solutions

    ReplyDelete
  107. Was really tough.somehow managed to finish at time.
    Important and expected questions were not asked.
    especially 2 mark question. 5 mark questions was easy.

    ReplyDelete
  108. Paper was moderate...but lengthy...of course...some questions were unexpected...
    all questions cud hav been done...but then it required time...n thinking...to get the student involved...but for that case...time was short...
    cbse shud shift d weightage of derivations to numerical problems..

    ReplyDelete
  109. damn...one hell of a question paper..its usually said tht board xam will be easier thn pre boards....now i know...thts total bullshit....unbelievably lengthy....questions we damn tough..aaaaaaaarghh......god plzzz make the marking more liberal...!! :/

    ReplyDelete
  110. usually the one mark questions require a lot of thinking and i end up leaving them...but this time they were damn easy....but the paper stabbed me at d back with those disgusting 2 n 3 mark questions...i pray for atleast an 80 altogether....

    ReplyDelete
  111. A paper which needs more time to think could have been made a lil easier cbse be lineant in correction ;(

    ReplyDelete
  112. unexpected questionsss...too lengthy.....

    ReplyDelete
  113. I dnt knw y we wastd our tym in studng dese much derivatns...

    ReplyDelete
  114. The exam was very difficult. I expected more essay questions. Hope CBSE will do some moderation.

    ReplyDelete
  115. paper was easyyyyy...but lenghty....if the i would get 30min more i would surly,can get65-70 marks...i hope that realy the paper has been leaked n i cn get another chance to prove my self..oooogod...hope u r listennnnng to my prayers......:(

    ReplyDelete
  116. Paper was very much tough and lengthy in comparison with previous years papers..i expected that i would do the paper about 95% when i got the question paper..but i ran out of time and attempted 80 to 85% of the paper as the paper was very tricky and time consuming...CBSE SHOULD DO VERY LOOSE MARKING..

    ReplyDelete
  117. paper was totally unexpected. Extremely disappointed be'cos i had expected more questions
    on derivations. Had spent three sleepless days preparing for this paper. Hope corrections are lenient. Thats my only expection for getting good marks.

    ReplyDelete
  118. the paper was not too good nt too bad. there was a lot of concepts to be put in. in a way these questions wil help me in entrance exam.

    ReplyDelete
  119. kya be ab kitna chahiye tje
    yaha fail hone ki ai hai or tu 80 pake b sadd hai

    ReplyDelete
  120. Its the first time in my life that I'm writing such a paper..it was soooo tough..wat was that lens prob?n ammeter-capacitor?double slit?polaroid?even the essays were tough..previous questions were much better..its given in cbse's website that 7o%are average questions..is this supposed to be average??I was shocked when I saw the questions..I'm not a student who is concentrating a lot on entrance..maybe that's why it was tough for me.. many said that most of the questions will be from text..but now..

    ReplyDelete
  121. the paper was completely unexpected!:(
    if they give such a lenthy paper they cant expect us to do well!
    and they gave questions that had thinking and took a lot of time..we hope the cbse does liberal correction..!

    ReplyDelete
  122. foreign set is easy than ours .,.,.,.
    there are straight forward que in it , ours was fking difficult

    ReplyDelete
  123. paper was too difficult. I did not expect such paper. Cbse should do something for liberal marking. post it everywhere guys. So the message spreads and cbse do something for a liberal marking scheme.

    ReplyDelete
  124. I WAS THROWN INTO A QUAKE AFTER SEEING THE PAPER .AFTER STUDYING FOR SO MANY HOURS AT THE END I WAS CRYING .NO EXPECTED DERIVATIONS. PAPER NOT MEANT FOR AVERAGE STUDENTS. PRETTY DISSAPOINTED. I HOPE MARKING IS LINEINT.

    ReplyDelete
  125. please let the marking be liberal. i was literally thrown into a quake after seeing the paper . the thing that annoyed me the most was that no expected derivations came.

    ReplyDelete
  126. the paper was lenthy... but easy as it was full on conceptual..... but the questions were not well framed.. as in the the capacitor one i knew the whole displacement current concept but saw the ques from a total diff. point of view.... expecting like 80 on 100..!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  127. It was damn difficult + lengthy ..no time to think..so different from previous years question..i had a preparation for 80 marks at a minimum..now its gonna be 65 marks for most..
    and yeah..i heard the paper was leaked in delhi and mathura due to which it may be cancelled..its being viewed in the news channels..

    ReplyDelete
  128. The paper was quite lengthy and no so easy too...the questions weren't so direct....we had to think and this took much time.....Pls make the correction liberal......

    ReplyDelete
  129. The paper was tougher than expected. I'm hoping the correction will be liberal.

    ReplyDelete
  130. it was too tough..didnt get time to complete and almost was too lenghty ..pls be liberal in correction..

    ReplyDelete
  131. The paper was quite lengthy and no so easy too...the questions weren't so direct....we had to think and this took much time.....Pls make the correction liberal......PLS

    ReplyDelete
  132. The Sample Papers should at least have been of comparable difficulty. Maybe then we would have known what to expect at least.

    ReplyDelete
  133. was too tough...lenghthy..pls be liberal in correction...alteast a pass markk....didnt get time to complete it..

    ReplyDelete
  134. I wrote the Foreign set paper here in the Gulf and to tell the truth it was much better than the one that's there on this site. Sure we had our share of tough questions but they were limited to two 3 mark questions and one 2 mark question. All of us over here found the paper lengthy but those students who had randomly done these HOTS questions, and I include those students who don't fare well with the rest of the class (no offence), found this exam a piece of cake.

    ReplyDelete
  135. the paper was set according to time limit. but the pressure was not at all considered. this is where the paper setter lacked. it was a balanced paper but still could have been made better with some practical thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  136. The paper was very lengthy, of course & unexpected...A paper like "This Year", i haven't seen it anywhere in the past 4 years ! The paper wasn't made for the average students. 1 markers were ok, but, 3 markers were all HOTS. which required a "lot of time". With only 3 days provided for the preparation, no one could have practiced enough to solve such a paper.

    ReplyDelete
  137. Cbse should understand that, not all the students are really good in physics. "Mostly" all students are poor in physics. They should have made the paper from that point of view.

    ReplyDelete
  138. really lengthy..didn't seem so while first reading..5 markers ok..1 markers ok..2&3 also overall ok..but i wasted time in lens ques..and missed 2nd part of res ques (5ohm)..to find the pot drop..finished revising just 30 secs before bell..expecting 62/70

    ReplyDelete
  139. please.....its our future......the people who made the question paper were also students once...and u all may have children like us...think of them getting low marks...our dream..our career..our life...its now completely in your hands teachers and board..the exam was very hard..please be liberal...or conduct one more exam...like a retest... for those who want to improve..like many state boards have...there may be students who go for coaching for iit,aieee etc..brilliant students...but we are not extraordinary....please take a decision to solve this problem..

    ReplyDelete
  140. Some question required knowledge of pre requisite numerical value! And are they nuts to ask about the function of "IF stage" in the block diagram?? Is it not sufficient only to identify it?? Are they obsessed with graph?? A total of 3 graphs were asked in the "all india set 3"..and do i need to mention about the lens question? Compared to last year question paper, this seems like a paper of iitjee standard..cbse hired the wrong person for setting up the paper..probably he is a moron or suffers from some abominable disease..hope the checking to be a bit liberal or else i'll be stuck within the 60 range..i openly threaten to take down the cbse.nic.in website on the day of results if they disappoint me...i had so much expectations of getting atleast in the 80's...all hopes shattered...i'm under depression..i can't even sleep..its 2am..i'll have to find a way to repose...stfu cbse

    ReplyDelete
  141. They avoided all those derivations , there was hardly any direct questions ,Very disappointing :(

    ReplyDelete
  142. easy,but very very LENGTHY!!.after months of preparation was so disappointed that couldnt allocate time properly let alone check the answers.definitely disappointed.

    ReplyDelete
  143. Unfortunately when my principal sir called me to ask about the exam i told him tat the paper was very easy and i finished in 2hrs 15min.... but now all of u r saying d opposite...... wat shud i tell him 2morrow.... one of my frnd says she will not pass........

    ReplyDelete
  144. SRY.....!!!! I DIDN'T MEAN TO BE RUDE.... JUST A LIL EXCITED.......tat's it.... !!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  145. the paper was really tough.....too lengthy.....the one mark questions required lot of thinking.....i'm really disappointed.....i didnt get time to attend the 5 mark questions properly....will chemistry be like this ????? after studying a lot will we have to cry after getting the question paper ??? please do something in favour of the students.......please conduct a retest please...........

    ReplyDelete
  146. the question paper was iit level.....we were totally shocked...cbse gave us a real disappointment....please.....do something for us......please conduct a retest.....please.......

    ReplyDelete
  147. many will get in range 40-60.
    me to expected 98-99 before the exam , but now getting just 86-90.

    ReplyDelete
  148. Expectation before exam --- Predicted Marks
    100 95+
    95-99 85+
    90-95 80+
    80-89 65+
    70-79 55+
    60-79 40+
    50-60 33

    ReplyDelete
  149. Paper was lenghty and a bit too standard like the last years paper. CBSE must consider the evaluation a bit liberally...

    ReplyDelete
  150. The question No 25 of 55/3 which was on the effect of dielectric on the energy and field of capacitor was incomplete. It was not given whether the battery remained connected or was disconnected...This resulted in utter confusion during the exam.

    ReplyDelete
  151. exam was really difficult , before exam i was expecting 90 mark but after exam i am hopeless that how much i will get,after reading questions our mind went completely blank and we could not even remember answer ,so please kindly make correction liberally.

    ReplyDelete
  152. It is not an exaggerative statement. Normally I finish my paper within 2 1/2 hours. Even 2011 paper i managed to fin1sh within 2 hours and got 69 marks. Today's physics paper was an easy paper but I never had time to complete the paper. The invigilator snatched away may paper. I couldnt complete 3 one mark questions and two diagrams which hardly needed another 5 to 10 minutes. These questions were well known to me. Had i got this 10 minutes i would have got atleast 68/70. I came from Big questions to small questions. Cant the invigilators be merciful. Can CbSE give atleast 10 minutes grace time for physics paper. CBSE should understand that physics involves both maths and understanding. So they should either give 10 -15 minutes time or stop asking long questions in 3 marks

    ReplyDelete
  153. My Answers to numericals(acc. set 2 all india)
    ...........1. 15 degrees
    ...............2.q/3e e-- epsilon0.
    ....3. P to Q , C to D.
    ....4.Manganin
    ....5.Electron
    .............6. Low Resistivity, high mag. permeability
    ..............7. all mutually perpendicular.
    .........8. size will be halved, Intensity 4 times.
    ..........9.(ii) Intensity reduced by four Times.,position will remain unaffected.
    ..........10.yes, i e^-t/RC
    ............11. C at high potential.
    ...........13. adv.- no chromatic abbr,with parabolic mirrror no spherical abbr.
    ............14.mutual induction
    ..........15. IF stage, Amplifier
    ............16. 242 ohms, 0.99 A rms
    ..........17. 4:1
    .......19. L1 and L2 = 75cm , L2 and L3 any value.
    ........21. Sky wave, Space Wave, Ground wave.
    ........23. 5 ohms............
    27. paschen series............
    28. (b) AND gate ...........
    30. (b) 4.8 cm

    ReplyDelete
  154. The paper was really a bullshit... it was so unimportant...every question was just like WTF!!! hah... hours of study gone in vain.. why the hell this happened in this year only..?? don't know wat will be the result :((

    ReplyDelete
  155. who said dat d ques was easy....it was not......
    It was little bit hard....& lengthy......
    5 mark ques was ok....but i came nervous when i saw 3 and 2 mark ques..... Am expecting 80+.....my 3 sleepless night and carefree days were of no use.....
    I think cbse will b liberal in checking....hope so....

    Now hope 4 chemistry.....best of luck......

    ReplyDelete
  156. Hey!!!!!! i there any way to give compartment coz i will need it.......Plz reply with answer..

    ReplyDelete
  157. Disappointed.
    Easy paper with a few tricky questions (but that's a given isn't it).
    Horribly lenghthy. :/
    I screwed up a five marker.
    An easy five marker.
    So may barely make it to my expectations. ):

    ReplyDelete
  158. i was planning to study abroad but after my physics exam my parents told that they have find out a shoe factory for me so guys pls tell me that is there any way to get compartment.........:(

    ReplyDelete
  159. probably if we suicide, they'll cancel 12th xams too

    ReplyDelete
  160. The paper was lengthy and we dint get enough time to think and do the sums . after studying Ncert whole book and practice papers i thought getting 90+ was very easy but the paper was too conceptual and each qn needed time to think and write . i am kind of disappointed and the conceptual qn of 3 marks was too hard on the whole only 2&5 mark qns were easy . 3 marks qns were terrible. pls make the correction liberal

    ReplyDelete
  161. THE PAPER WAS REALLY UNEXPECTED..AND MOSTLY CONCEPTUAL PROBLEMS WERE THERE...THUS STUDENTS FELT IT LENGTHY

    PREVIOUS YEARS PAPER WERE EASY AS COMPARED TO CBSE PHYSICS PAPER 2012

    THE CHECKING SHOULD BE VERY VERY EASY ELSE A LOT OF STUDENTS WOULD FAIL THIS TIME.

    ReplyDelete
  162. i think the pattern was totally different from previous year question papers....it was not made for the average and below average students.....even a very few of our studious friends felt difficult then what would be my condition.....

    ReplyDelete
  163. the paper did not follow the usual marks distribution among the chapters nor did it stick to the 'UPTO 20% HOTS questions norm' it had about 55-60% HOTS questions. those who prepared well knew how to tackle the questions but couldnt do so because of the lack of time, another half an hour and it would have been a good paper. This comment is to reflect the cries and pleas to the CBSE BOARD to do something about the matter as those who are going for engineering and medical fields are hit the most. Its about our future and our career's so I humbly request the authorities to take the necessary action.

    ReplyDelete
  164. The difficulty level of the paper was quite high and achieving more than 90% will be difficult too. Students prepare from the previous years' papers and last year the paper was quite easy. This time there were more application-based questions.

    physics class 12 paper..which was damn tough. more dan anyone wud hv ever expected. The usual important questions were missing wid some nervebreaking hots questions... Really..all dreams n aims shattered. I saw many kids crying outside d center.

    ReplyDelete
  165. its disappointing to see such a physics board paper.....after seeing the last year's paper,i thought it would be a cakewalk bt nw it wud certainly affect my overall percentage

    Very lengthy and a difficult one too...application was much more than expected

    ReplyDelete
  166. direct questions were missing.....no derivations....they expect us to start writing as soon as we see them....

    ReplyDelete
  167. yaar dobara karwa do nahi to percentage ki aisi ki taisi ho jayegi. bhai sab milke kaho tabhi kuch hoga

    ReplyDelete
  168. Totally unexpected,especially the essays.Where were the standard essays?I never expected in the world they would be totally avoided.
    It was really tough..... :(((

    ReplyDelete
  169. Before entering the examination hall, was easily expecting 85+ given the standard of board examinations in previous years.
    The paper was no doubt, unexpected.It was brain twisting and the analysis part consumed a lot of time. Hope to score a 60+ so I can at least apply for a decent college.

    ReplyDelete
  170. THE MARKING BETTER BE EASY!!!!!!!
    _|_

    ReplyDelete
  171. pls sent me physics foreign set 55/2/2 with solution.

    ReplyDelete
  172. Blunder exaM IT WAS...WHO SO EVER HAS MADE THIS PAPER...HE WILL B CURSED BY THE WHOLE COUNTRY....HELL WITH U MAN..!!

    ReplyDelete
  173. abe kitna ghatiya paper tha. har saal saala ratne waali bakwaas AC generator, moving coil glavanometer cyclotro aur pata nahi kya kya faltu bakwaas puchte the. aur is saal itni mushkil se main ye sab rat kar gaya aur kuch aya hi nahi. dimaag kharaab ho gaya. 90 soch kar gaya tha main ab 65 bhi aa jaye to abhut hai.

    ReplyDelete
  174. paper was upexpected i am tolally shocked when i saw the paper it was not really tough bt too lengty and totally conceptual.i also saw the previous sample papers and boards paper bt i never saw a paper like this .there were no standard questions like telescope etc.bt really i m totally shocked now..............

    ReplyDelete
  175. got 55/1 set...i admit i am not gud at memorising the things...but still the paper was completely unexpected...the topics which i listed in the "most important" list were not seen...all that LENS MAKERS, TELESCOPE, MICROSCOPE,INTERFERENCE, DIFFRACTION, DOUBLE SLIT,CYCLOTRON, GALVANOMETER, LOS COMMUNICATION, DIPOLE (AXIAL,EQUITORIAL),
    EM SPECTRUM, KIRCHOFFS, TRANSFORMER, P-N JUNCTION,VAN DE GRAPH GENERATER, ETC ETC ETC...
    there was not even a trace of any of these...
    i really have no idea about my result...every thing's gone..:(
    curse the person who set the paper...it was meant for "THE SUPER GENIUS" students...atleast not for just GOOD students...

    ReplyDelete
  176. Questions toh dekho..... Asking for expression of dc current in a capacitor.... Foolish a capacitor never allow dc current to flow through and affers infinite resistence.... What the hell no derivations no imp. Ques.... Spoiled whole feb learning physics

    ReplyDelete
  177. Peculiar i must say....all things which i expected 2 cm 4 sure didnt came....was a bit lengthy too bt was very unexpected....they should think as a student while making these ques. papers....we hv to study other sub too n we hv got so little time 4 phy....if compared to prev. years ques. this 1 was tough...really tough....!

    ReplyDelete
  178. ya dude...u r rite.....although the paper was not at all lenghty but it was really unexpected....now just pray for liberal evaluation...thats all we can do

    ReplyDelete
  179. you are a spoiled brat.Even if you get good marks you are not a good person.I hope that you fall from cloud 9 soon.

    ReplyDelete
  180. I had been with my son for the last 6 months for his preparations . We had gone through all previous question papaers and many sample papers available from many sources. The final exam questions were too disappointing. I am Post graduate engineer and can't understand what is CBSE expecting from a 17 year old student. Do they have to be ready to join NASA right after class XII. Whoever prepared this paper has absolutely no sense and understanding of what is expected from education at different stages of one's life.

    Too lengthy and tough paper; not a real teast of the talent and understanding of the student.

    ReplyDelete
  181. i wrote the foreign set too (55/2/1) and it was okay.... just a little too long. i was wondering how could they ask moving coil galvanometer for 3 marks!

    there were only 2 or 3 numericals and completely unexpected derivations. also a wrong question

    ReplyDelete
  182. You are dead right Gopika.

    These so calld academicians do not appreciate that they need to go with the changes happening around the world. World's leading institutes including IITs have been revisisiting their curriculam and exams to ensure that a test is to check what one knows and what he/she doesn't know. Also specialisation in any field is left to individual's taste. We don't have to teach almost 15% of electrical engineering or 15% Thermodynamics in Class XII.

    Unfortunately we need to wait till some matured academicians take charge of these affairs and the generations passing through the hands of such people are just unfortunate.

    My son also falls into this unfortunate group of students.

    ReplyDelete
  183. paper was nt made for average ones ... !!!
    really different from past year papers ...... A.I set is most toughest .....Hots are a special attraction of this paper ... okk hey i want the procedure and answer of that 3 lens ques(3 mrks),potential difference(2 mrks) and capacitor problem (2 marks) from A.I set 3 .... Please provide to the latest ...

    ReplyDelete
  184. Questions toh dekho........ Expession for dc current in a capacitor??? Foolish a capacitor serves as a block for dc current and offers infinite resistance. What the hell??? No derivations , toughest numericals no imp. questions. spoiled whole feb studying physics but highly disappointing

    ReplyDelete
  185. I feel they should give the entire three marks to everyone who attempted that lens problem...its damn ambiguous... paper otherwise was easy but lengthy... time management was the key... the person who set the paper must ahve jus picked random questions that came to his mind without caring abt the time limit and the level of difficulty... :(

    ReplyDelete
  186. the phy question paper was really tough... the lens problem was really tough..!!! itz more tough compared to last yearz.. and we were not able to attend it so nicely ...and the third set was also bit tougher among thre.. plzz be liberal in correcting the paper..

    ReplyDelete
  187. The paper was not so easy..but not too tough..but there were so many unexpected and mind application questions...only 10% question should be hots..but here there were more than 10%...bad...standard derivations were less...compared to earlier years QUESTIONS...

    ReplyDelete
  188. ENGLISH PAPER WAS A PANKAKE IN OUR MOUTH,

    BUT 4 PHYSICS WHAT SHOULD I SAY EVERYONE IS SAYING THE SAME, it was LENGTHY DIFFICULT 2 AND 3 MARKS WERE SHOCKING...

    TOI ALSO HAS D SAME STUFF TO SAY...

    HOPE CHEMISTRY, BIO AND MATHS KA AESA NA HO....

    ReplyDelete
  189. Very very very very very HARD & DIFFICULT paper
    Hoping for easy correction.

    ReplyDelete
  190. The 13 th questioncode no. 55/2, asks the student to draw the labelled ray daigram of a reflecting telescope and its two advantages over refracting telescope. But a similar question has been asked for 3 marks in 2009 Delhi paper. Like wise in question 30, in either or choice while students who the youngs double slit is lengthy one the other choice contains two short questions only. So those who have attempted the Ii choice were able to complete the paper very easily while those who attended the I choice were not able to do Is it not prudential to offer both choices of equal competence

    ReplyDelete
  191. the paper was really tricky........never expected such a paper....every question was so tricky that everything had to thought ad only then written........

    ReplyDelete
  192. physics paper all india was unexpected and it was really lengthy
    the problems 16 i) in set 3 was a bit tricky which made me to loose a lot of time in that and 25th question was a nasty one.
    the 26th question in set 3 was very difficult and it made us to loose a lot of time.
    3 marks ques were so long and there were not many direct questions
    overall physics paper was tough and lengthy
    many students may loose a lot of marks as one of the set is tougher than the other.
    so hope the correction is lineant and we get atleast the marks like the other set students

    ReplyDelete
  193. am really really disappointed aftr the xam...............the paper ws nt at all easy.......its nt tht it ws lengthy....but all the questions wwere like,as smeone said above there ws no derivations,just one frm energy stored.....acccrdng 2 cbse u r expected to put 15 mark questions tht could b answered by any student,tht ws nt 2 b seen in the question paper...exactly like smeone said,this question paper ws meant 4 iit students i feel....doesnt seem fair at all......2 endles sleepless nights spend on this nd all waste...it ws a very disappointing paper...only 10%of the students those who wrote the xam told it ws easy,k,fine.....and the most majority,it ws dreadful.......doesnt seems fair..

    ReplyDelete
  194. the paper was tougher than last years paper....never expected such a paper...... all the questions were tricky .everything had to be thought and only then written........

    ReplyDelete
  195. Similarly for question no 24 of code no. 55/2 for a 3 mark question diagram, deivation and graph has been called for in 3 mark question which is supposed to be asked in 5 mark question

    ReplyDelete

Do not spam. Spammers will be banned from this site